If we could just win out

"... But we were all refined, good girls from good families, and we realized somehow that we weren't going to college just for ourselves, but for all the girls who would follow after us - if we could just win out." -Bettie Locke

If you have read my last blog, you know I had recently attended my sorority’s (Kappa Alpha Theta) recent fall recruitment. The above quote was featured on a PowerPoint that was played for the girls under the theme “Picture Yourself Here,” where there was a scrapbook like presentation of the accomplishments, social events, etc. that the chapter (Zeta Upsilon) participated in that year. This quote gives me chills every time I read it, and I think that if more of us viewed the world and our actions like the founder of this sorority, we can build things to be better and better over time.

During the time Bettie Locke was in school, she and her friends (Hannah Fitch Shaw, Alice Allen Brant and Bettie Tipton Lindsey) struggled through a variety of situations. The reason the sorority was started was because fraternity men would let them wear their pins, (a symbol of membership) but not divulge what all of the symbology meant. This means that everything that defines a group means something to them. It is often said that ritual (the group’s customs and symbols) bind the group together. Bettie Locke felt that if she wasn’t “cool enough” to know their secrets, then she shouldn’t be wearing their symbols. 

They FOUGHT for and pioneered something that is still in use today, almost 150 years after the fact. It wasn’t a sure thing that they would be successful. These women were often ridiculed in school for their ideas. While thinking about this struggle, I think about other struggles that people are experiencing in the present day. How they are fighting for something that they believe in and that would make it easier for the generations to come. 

Sometimes I feel like we, as a whole, have lost some of that pioneering thinking and relentless execution. It could be because our forefathers (and mothers) fought so hard to make things TOO easy for us. This is obviously a generalization, and does not apply to everyone, but I still think that the majority of us are rather apathetic. Now, I’m not talking about starting a huge revolution, (unless we should) but I am talking about attempting to change things for the better or for our children and so on. 

Conforming to some things isn’t really a huge problem. Things like being mindful of others or being respectful. Conforming to other things can be a problem. I try to distinguish these two sets of things in understanding WHY we do these things. Can anyone tell me WHY we are on business casual dress? (Have no idea why it’s lasted this long)  Or why we work 5 day, 8 hour workdays? (Historically, linked to farming and manufacturing at least 100 years ago). Why do we have to be at work at all times to be seen as productive? (Because its easier to look busy than actually be busy) These types of things, while rocking the boat just a little, should be understood. If it just because “that’s how it has always been done,” that is conforming for conformity’s sake; out of convenience. 

Questioning things that make little to no sense is what pioneers and thought leaders do. But not ONLY questioning and identifying a need is enough. Coming up with a plan and actually changing that issue is the hard part. I think if we don’t fall into the apathetic boat, we fall into the “problem identifier” boat. Identifying problems is not displaying any sort of mental prowess or innovation. Changing them does.

 

What is Thought Leadership?

I’ve been thinking lately about how people define thought leadership. I define thought leadership as being a pioneer when it comes to identifying future solutions and trends. That means taking into account the past of a given subject, idea or industry, understanding the changes that it underwent to reach the present and what things about the present will ultimately drive the future. Thought leadership means different things to different people, but that’s my definition.

What frustrates me the most is that many individuals claim to be thought leaders because of their expertise and experience. While I am not trying to discount those things, that is only part of the big picture. Expertise and experience only help you to understand the past, the present and how you got to this point. The real differentiator for those that are actually thought leaders is the ability to understand the reasons for change and how that will affect their initiatives.

Inexperience offers a clear disadvantage as the only way to research how things were and became so is to ask others or research it alone. A lot gets missed when you haven’t “walked the path.” That doesn’t mean that inexperienced individuals cannot possibly be thought leaders. Inexperience offers an advantage as well.  Often, those that are inexperienced are young and idealistic. Youth can be defined as young to the industry, role or situation and/or young in terms of age. Youth can offer the advantage to not being set in a particular way of accomplishing things or generating ideas. This can be leveraged to initiate more creative solutions and visions for the future. 

In addition, thought leaders are not those that follow current trends without looking out ahead to see how they will develop and evolve. Individuals can be “superstars” currently in their industries, but if they don’t actively keep up with how things are changing, they are sure to fall behind. This issue sometimes goes hand in hand with the experience myth. Experience and current success does not automatically make an individual a thought leader. Thought leaders push the limits of things, look and plan ahead and develop multiple strategies for the future. 

While I don’t claim to be a superstar or experienced, I think that I am an emerging thought leader in a few different areas. In addition to seeing the future big picture, I think thought leaders really can change the direction of certain trends or overall practices. Things that are in place “just because” can be changed to be more efficient, or just make more sense for the current situation, time, environment, etc. Not all things should be changed “just because” either. I think thought leaders can identify those things that can be done better and actually come up with a solution to make it better. 

My last thought about thought leaders is that they don’t merely identify issues or trends. Thought leaders DO things, STRIVE to do things and ACHIEVE results. Just identifying something is less than half of the battle. Strategizing ways to leverage a trend or solution is the hardest thing to accomplish, and I believe true thought leaders do this. Any thoughts on thought leadership?